In reply to:
Andrew Yang🧢⬆️🇺🇸
@AndrewYang
·
4d
The statement is part of a public discourse discussing political strategy and governance, specifically regarding Kamala Harris's potential Cabinet choices and the implications for leadership and bipartisanship.
- The statement does not cause harm and is focused on political strategy, thus adhering to the principle. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy by suggesting a strategy that could demonstrate leadership and inclusivity. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by suggesting a strategic move without personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to suggest a strategy that could potentially benefit society by promoting bipartisanship. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform responsibly by engaging in a political discussion with integrity. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.