The statement critiques government efficiency and spending, suggesting a need for reform. It reflects a critical tone towards current governmental practices and implies a call for change.
- The statement uses strong language that could be seen as harmful or inflammatory, potentially reducing constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement lacks constructive criticism and instead uses a sweeping negative characterization of government. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement aims to influence public opinion on government reform, but does so in a divisive manner. [-1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.