In reply to:
Andrew Yang🧢⬆️🇺🇸
@AndrewYang
·
2d
The statement by Andrew Yang constitutes public discourse as it engages with a public issue, specifically the political choice between Kamala Harris and Donald Trump, and contributes to civic dialogue by expressing a preference and rationale for supporting Kamala Harris.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions, as it is a political endorsement rather than an attack. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by explaining why Kamala Harris is considered a better choice, potentially fostering empathy for those who share this view. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, focusing instead on a positive endorsement. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to advocate for a political choice, aiming for societal betterment by suggesting a candidate who aligns with the speaker's vision for the future. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech principles by responsibly using the platform to express a political opinion with integrity. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.