Rashida Tlaib

Rank 3 of 47
|
Score 281

The statement 'War crime upon a war crime' is a reaction to a reported incident involving the bombing of a vehicle carrying engineers in Gaza. The tone is accusatory and suggests a serious violation of international law, specifically war crimes. The intent appears to be to highlight and condemn the actions described in the linked report, which involves a public issue of significant concern: the conduct of military operations and their impact on civilians.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses strong language to condemn an action perceived as harmful, aligning with the principle of striving to do no harm by calling out potential war crimes. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does make a serious accusation against a military force, which could be seen as lacking respect for the dignity of those involved without further evidence. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement aims to promote understanding and empathy for the victims by highlighting the severity of the incident. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it is a direct accusation without room for discussion or alternative perspectives. [-1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses the platform to bring attention to a serious issue, potentially contributing to societal betterment by raising awareness of alleged war crimes. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement exercises free speech to address a public concern, but the accusatory tone may not fully align with using the platform responsibly and with integrity, as it lacks nuance and context. [-1]