In reply to:
samus
@beatrixsamus
·
1d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
1d
The statement is part of a conversation that touches on public discourse, specifically discussing former President Trump's communication style and policies related to minimum wage. The tone of the conversation is critical and somewhat sarcastic, focusing on the perceived contradictions in Trump's statements. The reply 'Yep' by @beatrixsamus is an agreement with the previous statement about Trump's salesmanship.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but is part of a critical discussion about a public figure.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and does not engage in harassment or hate speech.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy but rather agrees with a critical view. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks but is part of a critical dialogue.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.