Reposted by Rashida Tlaib
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the issue of potential bias and censorship on social media platforms, specifically Instagram, in relation to pro-Palestinian content. It highlights concerns about the influence of political affiliations on content moderation policies, which is a significant public issue.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but implies a critique of potential harm caused by censorship.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech but could be seen as targeting an individual based on their professional background. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy but rather highlights a perceived injustice.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue and could be seen as a personal attack on the individual mentioned. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech by raising concerns about censorship, but it could be more responsible by avoiding personal attacks.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.