Reposted by Rashida Tlaib
The statement and accompanying data discuss voter preferences related to U.S. foreign policy, specifically regarding an arms embargo on Israel. This is a substantive engagement with public issues, as it involves foreign policy and electoral implications.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but discusses a sensitive topic that could be polarizing.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It presents data that could promote understanding of voter priorities, though it may also deepen divisions on a contentious issue. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement is factual and does not engage in personal attacks, focusing on policy preferences. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- It uses data to inform public discourse, potentially influencing political strategies. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.