The statement engages in public discourse by addressing immigration policy and its enforcement, as well as critiquing the actions of the Biden-Harris administration in relation to democratic principles. It compares the perceived threat to democracy posed by the administration's actions to that of Trump's social media posts.
- The statement does not directly harm with words, but it implies a strong critique of the administration's actions.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it is critical of public figures.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on criticism rather than constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but does not provide a constructive dialogue or evidence to support its claims, and it compares actions in a way that could be seen as an ad hominem attack on the administration. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to influence public opinion on immigration policy and democratic principles, but it does so in a divisive manner. [-1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement exercises free speech but could be seen as lacking responsibility and integrity by making a strong claim without substantial evidence. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.