Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with the public issue of climate change and electoral politics, specifically critiquing Kamala Harris's candidacy in the context of climate policy and advocating for the Green Party as an alternative. The tone is critical and aims to influence voter behavior by presenting an argument against a mainstream political candidate in favor of a third-party option.
- The statement does not directly harm with words and actions, but it does critique a public figure's policy stance, which is a normal part of political discourse.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding of the author's perspective on climate policy and electoral choices, but it may lack empathy towards differing viewpoints.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of Kamala Harris's climate policies, but it does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to advocate for what the author believes is a better climate policy, aligning with the principle of using influence for societal betterment. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by responsibly using the platform to discuss political and environmental issues. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.