Jill Stien

Rank 40 of 47
|
Score -104

The statement constitutes public discourse as it addresses a public issue concerning gender-affirming care for trans Americans and questions the response of the queer community, while also promoting a political stance with the hashtag #VoteGreen #SteinWare2024.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but implies criticism of Kamala Harris's stance, which could be seen as a call for accountability.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does question the response of a community, which could be seen as provocative.
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is more focused on criticism and political advocacy. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in criticism of Kamala Harris's position but does not resort to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses influence to advocate for a political position and calls for action, which aligns with using influence for societal betterment from the perspective of the speaker's political stance. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform to express a political opinion, though the integrity of the argument could be questioned if it lacks context or evidence. [+1]