Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement questions the Democratic Party's influence over Black journalists, suggesting an overreach in controlling media narratives. It raises concerns about political manipulation and autonomy in journalism, particularly regarding racial dynamics.
- The statement does not directly harm but implies negative actions by the Democratic Party, which could be seen as harmful if unfounded. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy but could be seen as accusatory, potentially leading to harassment if not substantiated.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it frames the issue in a confrontational manner. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue and could be seen as a personal attack on the Democratic Party. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to question political actions, which could be seen as aiming for societal betterment if the claims are true. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement exercises free speech but should ensure claims are accurate to maintain integrity.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.