Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
Leah Konen *KEEP YOUR FRIENDS CLOSE out 2/20*
@LeahKonen
·
456d
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with political issues, specifically the voting process and the policies of a political figure, Kamala Harris, in the context of the Gaza situation. The tone is accusatory and dismissive, labeling a vote for Harris as a 'symbolic vote for genocide,' which is a strong and provocative claim.
- The statement uses inflammatory language that could be considered harmful, as it equates voting for Harris with supporting genocide, which is a serious accusation. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of others, as it uses derogatory language ('Holocaust Harris') that could be seen as hate speech. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it dismisses the act of voting for Harris as unethical without engaging in a nuanced discussion. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it resorts to personal attacks and hyperbolic language rather than reasoned argument. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech but does so irresponsibly by using inflammatory and potentially harmful language. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.