Reposted by Jake Tapper
The statement criticizes a political endorsement by The Washington Post, suggesting it is an act of cowardice that undermines democracy. It accuses the endorsement of inviting intimidation by Donald Trump and labels the institution as spineless, despite its reputation for courage.
- The statement uses strong language that could be seen as harmful, such as 'cowardice' and 'spinelessness,' which may not align with striving to do no harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, but it does make a strong accusation against The Washington Post and its owner, which could be seen as disrespectful. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, instead opting for personal attacks on the institution's character. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech but does so in a manner that may not be considered responsible or with integrity, given the accusatory tone. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.