Reposted by Jake Tapper
The statement involves a political accusation and critique, which constitutes public discourse as it engages with public figures and issues of political rhetoric.
- The statement accuses Harris of promoting violence, which could be seen as harmful if not substantiated, potentially violating the principle of doing no harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech directly, but it does involve a public accusation that could affect the dignity of the accused.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on accusations without addressing the broader context or seeking dialogue. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement lacks constructive criticism and dialogue, as it does not acknowledge the similar language used by Trump, which could be seen as a personal attack or selective criticism. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement engages in public discourse but may not use the platform responsibly by omitting relevant context, which could mislead the public. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.