In reply to:
Censorship is for LOSERS
@GoldMeddle1
·
255d
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the issue of censorship and narrative control by political parties, which is a significant public concern. The tone is neutral and analytical, suggesting a critique of both political parties without resorting to inflammatory language.
- The statement does not use harmful language and maintains a neutral tone, adhering to the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- There is no engagement in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, respecting the privacy and dignity of others. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by acknowledging that both parties engage in narrative control, fostering a balanced view. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by responding to a question about censorship without personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds free speech by discussing censorship and narrative control, using the platform responsibly. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.