Reposted by Dr. Jill Steinš»
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the political issue of U.S. foreign policy towards Palestine and the impact of American presidential elections on Palestinians. It expresses a strong stance on Palestinian resilience and opposition to occupation and apartheid.
- The statement does not directly incite harm but uses strong language that could be interpreted as confrontational.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech but could be seen as dismissive of those voting for Harris.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it focuses on a strong, oppositional stance rather than dialogue.Ā [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it dismisses the perspective of those voting for Harris without engaging in discussion.Ā [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to advocate for Palestinian rights, which can be seen as contributing to societal betterment from that perspective.Ā [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement exercises free speech but could be more responsible by fostering dialogue rather than division.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.