Jill Stien

Rank 45 of 47
|
Score -126

The statement engages in public discourse by addressing political issues, specifically critiquing the influence of major corporations and lobbying groups on the two major political parties in the United States. It advocates for the Green Party as an alternative, suggesting that it is not influenced by these entities.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly harm others with words or actions, but it uses strong language that could be seen as divisive.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does make broad accusations against political parties.
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding of its perspective on political corruption and advocates for integrity, aligning with this principle. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue with those in disagreement, as it makes broad accusations without inviting discussion. [-1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its influence to advocate for the Green Party, which it claims is powered by people rather than corporations, aligning with this principle. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement exercises free speech by critiquing political parties and promoting an alternative, but the strong language could be seen as lacking in responsibility and integrity.