Jill Stien

Rank 44 of 47
|
Score -126

The statement is provocative and appears to mix factual claims with political opinion. It suggests a serious international conflict and criticizes a political figure for perceived inaction. The call to vote for a different president implies a political agenda.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement may cause harm by spreading potentially misleading information about international conflict. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    It does not respect the privacy and dignity of the individuals mentioned, potentially engaging in public shaming. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement lacks empathy and understanding, focusing on criticism rather than constructive dialogue. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    It does not engage in constructive criticism, instead opting for a personal attack on a political figure. [-2]