Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement engages in public discourse by discussing political activities related to voting and candidates, specifically focusing on antiwar candidate Dr. Jill Stein and the actions of Democrat Rashida Tlaib. It addresses public issues such as political engagement and representation among Muslim and Arab American voters.
- The statement does not directly harm with words or actions, but it implies criticism of Rashida Tlaib without providing context.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it could be seen as indirectly questioning the dignity of Rashida Tlaib. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on political criticism. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement implies criticism of Rashida Tlaib without engaging in constructive dialogue or providing evidence, which could be seen as a personal attack. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to promote a specific political agenda, which can be seen as contributing to public discourse. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by discussing political issues, but the integrity of the discourse could be questioned due to the lack of context and potential bias.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.