The statement engages in public discourse by addressing societal issues such as meritocracy, free speech, and ideological conflicts. It presents a dichotomy between opposing values and calls for a choice, indicating a political or ideological stance.
- The statement does not directly harm others but could be seen as divisive by framing issues in a binary manner.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but the binary framing could indirectly affect the dignity of those with opposing views.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion as it presents issues in a confrontational manner. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it presents a binary choice without room for discussion. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to promote a specific ideological stance, which may not be for the betterment of society if it polarizes rather than unites. [-1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by advocating for it over censorship, but the responsible use of the platform is questionable due to its divisive tone.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.