Marianne Williamson

Rank 21 of 47
|
Score 57
10/26/2024, 3:56:29 PM
X
In reply to:
Oort Cloud Ranger
@OortCloudRanger
·
256d
@marwilliamson @cmclaw Why is this the only account you reply to, of all the replies to your post?

There have been a few decent replies, asking honest questions, but you choose to respond to a troll comment?

This discussion you keep claiming the Country needs to have is breaking down on your level.
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
257d
@cmclaw Since this is my Twitter account, shouldn’t you go away?
Mark
@cmclaw
·
257d
@marwilliamson Go away
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
257d
One presidential candidate is a climate change denier, while the other wants to continue fracking but increase investments in green energy. That’s how bought and sold we are by Big Oil.
James Murray
@James_BG
·
258d
It really is hard to get across quite how bad this is. We’re on track for 3C of warming, which could easily result in catastrophic cascading risks to human civilisation. And emissions are still rising. https://www.businessgreen.com/ne…

The statement is part of a broader conversation about climate change and public engagement on social media. It reflects a request for clarification in a dialogue that has become somewhat contentious. The tone is neutral and seeks to understand the previous comment better.

  1. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement attempts to engage in constructive dialogue by asking for clarification rather than making assumptions or personal attacks. It does not engage in ad hominem arguments and seeks to understand the other party's perspective. [+1]