The statement addresses the impact of subscription cancellations on reporters rather than the ownership of the publication, suggesting a concern for the livelihoods of journalists. It engages with a public issue related to media consumption and its consequences.
- The statement does not use harmful language and aims to clarify the impact of cancellations, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement seeks to promote understanding by explaining the unintended consequences of subscription cancellations on reporters, aligning with the principle of promoting empathy and compassion. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by addressing a concern without resorting to personal attacks, aligning with the principle of constructive criticism and dialogue. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.