Reposted by Jake Tapper
The statement addresses the issue of canceling subscriptions to news outlets due to management decisions, suggesting that such actions are performative and harm journalists. It engages with the public discourse on media consumption and accountability.
- The statement does not directly harm others but critiques a common consumer action, suggesting it may have unintended negative consequences.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement attempts to promote understanding by highlighting the impact of subscription cancellations on journalists, fostering empathy for those affected. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of consumer behavior without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- By discussing the implications of subscription cancellations, the statement uses its influence to encourage more thoughtful consumer actions. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by expressing an opinion on a public issue and uses the platform to contribute to civic dialogue. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.