Marianne Williamson

Rank 21 of 47

Score 57

@EverymanVoice Indeed I could have. But more importantly in terms of the state of our democracy, I should have had the opportunity.

10/26/2024, 10:13:32 PM

In reply to:

EverymanConservative

@EverymanVoice

258d

Exactly! Although Harris was an AG, US Senator, and VP for almost 4 years, she is answering questions like an outsider who is not one of the Washington insiders. What has she been doing? At this point, I think Marianne Williamson could easily win a debate against Harris.

Jeffrey A Tucker

@jeffreyatucker

258d

I've paid far more attention to Kamala than I ever imagined I would with a presidential candidate, listening to her interviews, speeches, and so on.

I suspect that many people, even people who are her partisans, are realizing something quite shocking. It's this: she knows less…

The statement engages in a discussion about political figures and the state of democracy, which constitutes public discourse. The tone suggests a critique of the political process and the opportunities available to individuals within it.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement does not directly harm others with words or actions, maintaining a neutral tone.
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement engages in a critique of the political process without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, focusing instead on the broader issue of democratic opportunities. [+1]
Principle 7:
I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
The statement upholds the principles of free speech by contributing to a discussion about democracy and political figures, using the platform responsibly. [+1]