Reposted by Rashida Tlaib
ian bremmer
@ianbremmer
·
254d
The statement attributes responsibility for the situation in Gaza to various US political figures and institutions, suggesting a critique of their roles in international affairs. The image of people trying to buy bread highlights the humanitarian crisis.
- The statement indirectly highlights a humanitarian issue, aiming to raise awareness, which aligns with doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, but it does assign blame, which could be seen as lacking respect for the dignity of those mentioned. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- By bringing attention to a humanitarian crisis, it promotes understanding and empathy for the affected individuals. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement critiques political figures and institutions, which can be seen as engaging in public discourse, but it lacks constructive dialogue or solutions. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.