Marianne Williamson

Rank 21 of 47
|
Score 57
10/27/2024, 9:00:17 AM
X
In reply to:
Pope Hermen Eutered Esquire 6th
@hermen_eutered
·
254d
@marwilliamson You’re spending too much time on Twitter if you actually believe that. There is absolutely one side that lies about consequential shit nonstop. The “enemy from within” guy is all about stomping all over the first amendment, despite what ghouls like Elmo say.
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
254d
The world has become much less black & white to me. I don't feel "this side is right" & "this side is wrong" so much anymore. Instead I hear a lot of juxtaposed truths, where "we're both right and to some extent we're both wrong" creates space for more human understanding.

The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the issue of political bias and misinformation, suggesting that both sides of a political divide engage in misleading behavior. It aims to provide a nuanced perspective on the topic.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not use harmful language and attempts to provide a balanced view, thus adhering to the principle of doing no harm. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by acknowledging complexity and the presence of 'many shades of darkness,' which encourages empathy and a more nuanced view of political issues. [+2]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue by not attacking the original poster personally and instead focusing on the broader issue of misinformation across political lines. [+2]