In reply to:
Marion Curson
@marion_curson8
·
252d
The statement by @marion_curson8 and the subsequent reply by @marion_curson8 constitute public discourse as they engage with a significant public issue, namely the conflict involving Israel and Palestine. The conversation touches on sensitive topics such as genocide and the responsibilities of public figures in addressing these issues.
- The original statement by @marion_curson8 uses strong language that could be considered harmful, as it accuses someone of not caring about genocide, which is a serious allegation. The reply does not directly address this but links to an article, which could be seen as an attempt to provide more information. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The original statement could be seen as disrespectful and potentially harassing, as it questions the integrity of a public figure based on their ethnicity. The reply does not engage in further harassment but does not address the potential harm of the original statement. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The original statement lacks empathy and compassion, as it makes a harsh accusation without seeking to understand the other person's perspective. The reply does not actively promote understanding or compassion but redirects to an article, which might provide more context. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The original statement is not constructive and engages in a personal attack by questioning the person's motives based on their ethnicity. The reply does not engage in personal attacks but does not address the original statement's lack of constructiveness. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The original statement does not use the platform responsibly, as it makes serious accusations without evidence. The reply attempts to redirect the conversation to a potentially informative article, which could be seen as a more responsible use of the platform.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.