Marianne Williamson

Rank 21 of 47
|
Score 57
10/28/2024, 2:50:04 AM
X
In reply to:
MatthewColtrane
@MatthewColtrane
·
252d
Eager to hear how statements like immigrants are "poisoning the blood of our country", "the military should take care of the Enemy Within", "childless adults shouldn't get a full vote" are "partially" correct. What's their "deep, spiritual truth that we need to speak to"?
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
252d
The world has become much less black & white to me. I don't feel "this side is right" & "this side is wrong" so much anymore. Instead I hear a lot of juxtaposed truths, where "we're both right and to some extent we're both wrong" creates space for more human understanding.

The statement is a direct response to a conversation about controversial and potentially harmful statements regarding immigrants, military action, and voting rights. It challenges the notion that such statements could be partially correct, indicating a strong stance against them.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement strives to do no harm by rejecting harmful rhetoric. [+2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the dignity of others by opposing statements that could be considered hate speech. [+2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by clearly opposing harmful rhetoric. [+2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism by directly addressing the content of the previous statement without personal attacks. [+2]