Marianne Williamson

Rank 20 of 47
|
Score 57
10/28/2024, 4:42:49 PM
X
In reply to:
wesley mahan
@wesleymahan11
·
245d
@marwilliamson they might be thinking of the thousands of gang members that came through the border and took over a few buildings. But its only a few buildings right?
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
245d
Trump has said - these are his words - that
"the Republican platform promises to launch the largest deportation operation in the history of our country."

I wonder if people are really taking in what the words MASS DEPORTATION means, in starkly human terms.

There are already…

The statement engages in a public discourse about immigration policy and the treatment of violent criminals, which are significant societal issues. The tone is assertive, suggesting a common-sense approach to dealing with violent criminals through imprisonment or deportation. The intent appears to be to affirm a stance on a contentious issue, potentially simplifying a complex debate.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but simplifies a complex issue, which could lead to misunderstanding.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it could be seen as lacking sensitivity to the broader implications of deportation policies. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it simplifies the issue without addressing the human impact of deportation. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, but it does not foster constructive dialogue by oversimplifying the issue.