In reply to:
TheCrusherChronicles
@CatherineCrush3
·
243d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
243d
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing a public policy issue related to immigration and border infrastructure. It critiques a political decision by former President Trump, suggesting that a bipartisan bill could have addressed the issue but was not pursued for political reasons.
- The statement does not use harmful language and focuses on a policy critique rather than personal attacks. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the dignity of others by not engaging in hate speech or harassment. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement attempts to promote understanding by providing context about a bipartisan bill and its potential impact. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of a political decision, avoiding personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to discuss a societal issue, aiming to inform and possibly influence public opinion. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech principles by responsibly discussing a public policy issue. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.