Reposted by Rashida Tlaib
The statement addresses a significant public issue concerning international relations, humanitarian aid, and the impact of governmental decisions on civilian populations. It highlights the banning of a UN agency by Israel and suggests broader implications for multilateral institutions.
- The statement does not directly harm with words or actions but raises awareness of potential harm caused by the ban.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, focusing on institutional actions rather than personal attacks.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement aims to promote understanding and empathy by highlighting the potential humanitarian impact of the ban. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks but rather critiques a governmental decision, aligning with constructive criticism. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to raise awareness of a significant issue, potentially contributing to societal betterment. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by responsibly discussing a public issue with integrity. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.