Jill Stien

Rank 46 of 47
|
Score -128

The statement criticizes Kamala Harris for allegedly ignoring Dr. Jill Stein, suggesting hypocrisy and urging accountability. The tone is confrontational and accusatory.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses a confrontational tone, which may not align with striving to do no harm. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement accuses Harris of hypocrisy, which could be seen as disrespectful and not upholding dignity. [-1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue and instead uses personal attacks. [-2]