The statement is a politically charged message that criticizes both Kamala Harris and Donald Trump, suggesting that voting for them would enable genocide. It advocates for a new political force free from corporate and military influence, urging voters to consider alternatives that prioritize people, the planet, and peace.
- The statement uses strong language that could be considered harmful by suggesting that voting for certain candidates enables genocide, which may incite fear or anger. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in direct harassment or hate speech, but the use of the term 'genocide' could be seen as disrespectful to those affected by actual genocides. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement attempts to promote understanding and compassion by advocating for a political force that prioritizes people and peace, but the accusatory language may undermine this effort.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it uses inflammatory language rather than reasoned argumentation. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement aims to use influence for societal betterment by encouraging voters to consider alternatives to mainstream political candidates. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement exercises free speech but does so in a way that may not be responsible or constructive due to its extreme language. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.