Marianne Williamson

Rank 20 of 47
|
Score 57
10/29/2024, 1:56:40 AM
X
In reply to:
Cazzy Star (Down Under)
@Cazzy
·
241d
@marwilliamson I agree with you! I don't support political violence and we need to find ways to do unity amongst the whole population. I just think at some point we have to draw a line and understand some people won't see reason and deserve the scorn. Some of them do. Far too many won't.
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
241d
@Cazzy You do realize that there are millions of people supporting Trump who do NOT see the movement as brownshirts-adjacent. You do. I do. Millions do. But they do not; they think we're simply taking him too literally. And it's moral persuasion, not attack or judgement, that's going to…
Cazzy Star (Down Under)
@Cazzy
·
241d
@marwilliamson I appreciate your point of view and I'm not calling you a secret Republican or anything. I just find it very hard to stomach trying to be kind and doing outreach to people who publicly support selling you out to the brownshirts. There are other ways.
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
241d
@Cazzy After the year and a half that I have gone through, how can you say I have not picked a side? Plus, I have done media ( I have posted it here) where I have publicly supported her. But I also believe this: Martin Luther King said “you have very little morally persuasive power…
Cazzy Star (Down Under)
@Cazzy
·
241d
@marwilliamson I get what you're saying but at some point you have to pick a side and criticize the people who are voting for the mass deportation/concentration camp side. We can be understanding of each other but some bases need to learn tough lessons, to be told their views are abhorrent
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
241d
@Cazzy We’re miscommunicating, you and I:)

The statement is part of a broader conversation about political discourse and persuasion, touching on themes of moral persuasion versus scorn in political debates. It engages with public issues related to political division and the approach to political opponents, thus constituting public discourse.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement suggests using scorn to change someone's vote, which could be seen as harmful and counterproductive in political discourse, violating the principle of doing no harm. [-2]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it advocates for scorn rather than moral persuasion or dialogue. [-2]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it suggests using scorn rather than engaging in meaningful conversation. [-2]