The statement critiques a voter's understanding of disinformation and implies that they are misinformed about the origins of Covid-19. It engages with public issues such as disinformation and the origins of Covid-19, thus constituting public discourse.
- The statement does not directly harm with words, but it implies the voter is a victim of disinformation, which could be seen as dismissive. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in direct harassment or hate speech, but it could be seen as disrespectful to the individual's dignity by labeling them a victim of disinformation. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on criticizing the voter's beliefs. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue and instead makes a personal critique of the voter's understanding. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses free speech to critique public issues, but it could be more responsible by fostering constructive dialogue.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.