The statement addresses a perceived national identity crisis and suggests a shift in societal values, which constitutes public discourse as it engages with public issues and debates. The tone is assertive and suggests a call to action for political engagement.
- The statement does not directly harm with words, but it implies a negative view of certain societal changes, which could be seen as divisive. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it frames the issue in a confrontational manner. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement suggests a strategy for political victory without engaging in personal attacks, but it does not foster constructive dialogue.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to rally support for a political cause, but it does not clearly indicate betterment of society.Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform to express a political viewpoint, but the responsibility and integrity of the message are debatable.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.