Jake Tapper

Rank 16 of 47
|
Score 103

The statement engages in public discourse by discussing potential public health policy changes and the influence of a public figure, RFK Jr., on vaccine policy. It raises concerns about the implications of these changes on public health.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but implies potential harm by suggesting vaccines might be removed, which could alarm the public. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech but could be seen as undermining the dignity of those who support vaccines.
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it presents a one-sided view without fostering dialogue. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it presents a speculative scenario without evidence or discussion. [-1]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement uses free speech to raise concerns but lacks responsibility by not providing evidence or a balanced view. [-1]