In reply to:
Springer Spaniels Rock
@Maverick5428
·
196d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
196d
The statement engages in a public discourse about immigration policy and the responsibilities of Congress and the former President in addressing the issue. It attributes blame to Congress for neglecting their duties and criticizes former President Trump for killing a bill that could have improved infrastructure to handle immigration effectively.
- The statement does not directly harm others but assigns blame, which could be seen as a critique rather than harmful speech.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement engages in criticism of Congress and Trump but does not resort to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, focusing instead on their actions and decisions. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to discuss a significant societal issue, potentially contributing to public awareness and dialogue. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement exercises free speech by discussing political accountability and policy decisions, using the platform to engage in civic dialogue. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.