Reposted by Marianne Williamson
philip lewis
@Phil_Lewis_
·
247d
The statement criticizes DuPont for prioritizing profits and executive compensation over public health and safety, highlighting the disparity between the company's financial actions and the consequences of its environmental impact.
- The statement aims to highlight harm caused by corporate actions, aligning with the principle of striving to do no harm by raising awareness. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity, focusing on corporate actions rather than personal attacks. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- By drawing attention to the impact of corporate actions on public health, the statement promotes understanding and empathy for affected individuals. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism of corporate practices without resorting to personal attacks, focusing on factual information. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to advocate for societal betterment by calling out corporate practices that may harm public health. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement exercises free speech responsibly by addressing a public issue with factual information. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.