Marianne Williamson

Rank 21 of 47
|
Score 57
11/1/2024, 6:14:28 AM
X
In reply to:
daledwayer
@daledwayer
·
247d
@marwilliamson You can't possibly read this and believe it's true
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
247d
Wow
Nathan J Robinson
@NathanJRobinson
·
248d
WSJ reports that the National Archives museum has removed references to Martin Luther King, Japanese internment, Native Americans, union organizers, and birth control, because presenting American history honestly would make Republicans uncomfortable https://www.currentaffairs.org/n…

The statement and conversation engage in public discourse by discussing the potential sanitization of American history in public exhibits, which is a significant societal issue. The conversation critiques the removal of historical references that may be politically motivated, raising concerns about historical accuracy and transparency.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The conversation aims to highlight potential harm in altering historical narratives, aligning with the principle of doing no harm by advocating for truthful representation. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The discussion promotes understanding and awareness of the importance of preserving historical accuracy, fostering empathy for those affected by historical events. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The conversation engages in constructive criticism of the actions taken by the National Archives, avoiding personal attacks and focusing on the issue at hand. [+1]
  4. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    By addressing the potential implications of altering historical narratives, the conversation uses its platform to advocate for societal betterment through historical truth. [+1]