Reposted by Dr. Jill Steinš»
The statement critiques the current administration's stance on protests against genocide, suggesting that they have labeled protesters negatively and that law enforcement in Democratic areas has responded with violence. The tone is critical and accusatory, focusing on the actions and rhetoric of political leaders.
- The statement does not directly incite harm but implies that the administration's actions are harmful to protesters, which could be seen as a critique rather than a violation.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement accuses the administration of labeling protesters in a derogatory manner, which could be seen as a form of verbal attack, potentially violating the principle of respecting dignity.Ā [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue but rather criticizes the administration's actions and rhetoric, which could be seen as a failure to engage constructively.Ā [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech by critiquing public figures and their policies, aligning with the principle of using one's platform responsibly to address public issues.Ā [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.