The statement by Coates addresses a significant public issue, namely the discussion around speaking up about genocide and apartheid in Palestine. It reflects a strong stance on the potential consequences of losing access to power and platforms for voicing such concerns, indicating engagement in public discourse.
- The statement uses strong language that could be seen as harmful or inflammatory, potentially violating the principle of doing no harm with words.Ā [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but the use of profanity could be seen as disrespectful.Ā [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses more on the speaker's defiance.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it is more of a personal expression of defiance rather than an invitation for discussion.Ā [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses the speaker's influence to highlight a significant issue, which aligns with using influence for societal betterment.Ā [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech by expressing a willingness to speak out despite potential consequences, but the use of profanity may not reflect responsible use of the platform.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.