Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement questions the motives of the Green Party in Ireland and criticizes Kamala Harris for her stance on Israel and Gaza. It uses strong language, implying that Jill Stein is not aggressive enough for the Green Party. The statement engages in public discourse by addressing international political dynamics and election strategies.
- The statement uses charged language that could be seen as harmful, particularly in its accusation of supporting genocide. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It does not respect the dignity of the individuals involved, using terms like 'warmonger' and 'Putin shill.' [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, instead it polarizes the discussion. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism, as it uses personal attacks rather than focusing on policy differences. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.