Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement appears to be a critique of the Democratic Party's actions regarding Dr. Jill Stein's campaign, suggesting surveillance or monitoring of her activities and the show. It implies a lack of transparency or ethical conduct by the party, which could be a substantive issue in public discourse.
- The statement does not directly harm others but implies unethical behavior by a political party, which could be seen as harmful if unsubstantiated. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech but could be seen as disrespectful if it falsely accuses individuals of unethical behavior.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue but rather makes an accusatory claim without evidence, which could be seen as a personal attack on the party's integrity. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses free speech to raise a concern but does not provide evidence or context, which may not be responsible use of the platform. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.