Jill Stien

Rank 34 of 47
|
Score -51

The statement is highly critical and accusatory, using strong language to condemn the European Greens and their actions. It accuses them of complicity in serious international issues and frames their political actions as harmful. The tone is confrontational and seeks to rally support for Dr. Jill Stein.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses inflammatory language, which could be seen as harmful, reducing its adherence to the principle of doing no harm. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The accusatory tone and public shaming of the European Greens may not respect their dignity, potentially violating this principle. [-2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it focuses on blame and condemnation. [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue, instead opting for personal attacks and strong accusations. [-2]