Reposted by Rashida Tlaib
The statement addresses a significant public issue concerning content moderation on social media platforms, potential censorship, and the treatment of employees who raise concerns about these practices. It highlights a specific incident involving Meta, a major tech company, and touches on broader themes of free speech, corporate responsibility, and the handling of sensitive content related to conflict zones.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but highlights a situation where harm may have been done by flagging sensitive images incorrectly.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity by not engaging in harassment or hate speech, but it raises concerns about potential corporate actions that may not respect these values.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by bringing attention to a potentially unjust situation, encouraging empathy for those affected by the content moderation policies. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks but rather critiques corporate actions, aligning with constructive criticism. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- By highlighting this issue, the statement uses its influence to potentially drive societal change regarding content moderation practices. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by addressing potential censorship issues and uses the platform to responsibly discuss these concerns. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.