Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement involves a political opinion regarding the preferences of Muslim voters in an election context, which constitutes public discourse. It critiques Kamala Harris's engagement with Muslim voters and suggests an alternative candidate, Dr. Jill Stein, as a preferred choice. The statement implies that Kamala Harris has not met the demands of Muslim voters, which is a substantive engagement with public issues.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but it does imply criticism of Kamala Harris's actions without detailed context.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity, as it does not engage in personal attacks or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on criticism without offering constructive dialogue.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement offers criticism of Kamala Harris but does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to highlight voter preferences, which can contribute to societal betterment by encouraging political engagement. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform to express a political opinion responsibly. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.