Jill Stien

The statement is highly critical and uses strong language to express disagreement with a political figure's stance on trans rights and their political actions. It accuses the figure of misrepresenting another party's views and implies a severe moral failing by using the term 'genocide.'

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement uses inflammatory language, which could be seen as harmful, particularly the use of the term 'genocide.' [-2]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement does not respect the dignity of the individuals involved, using harsh and accusatory language. [-2]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, instead using strong negative language. [-2]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement does not engage in constructive criticism, opting for personal attacks and hyperbolic language. [-2]