Jake Tapper

Rank 14 of 47

Score 107

Reposted by Jake Tapper

Don't make me tap the sign again.

Selzer is a great pollster, and you'd be foolish to dismiss her poll. It adds real uncertainty to forecasts. At the same time, neither should you suddenly abandon all of your prior views about the state of the race.

Sean T at RCP

@SeanTrende

237d

I do want to emphasize this as well. If a poll has an error margin of, say, +/- 4%, that is inherent to the polling, which is simply a function of sample size (and, technically, variance). There is nothing in the world even the best pollster can do about this.

11/2/2024, 11:48:00 PM

The statement engages in public discourse by discussing the reliability and interpretation of polling data, which is a significant aspect of political analysis and public opinion. It emphasizes the importance of considering multiple perspectives and data points in political forecasting.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement does not use harmful language and encourages a balanced view of polling data, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]
Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
The statement promotes understanding by advising against dismissing a poll outright while also cautioning against over-reliance on a single data point, fostering a nuanced view. [+1]
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement engages in constructive dialogue by addressing potential disagreements about the interpretation of polling data without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]