In reply to:
MePeeto
@USAF_Aviator
·
247d
Kim Iversen 🇺🇸
@KimIversenShow
·
248d
The statement engages in a historical and religious debate about the identity of Jesus and his disciples, which is a matter of public discourse. The tone is corrective and somewhat sarcastic, aiming to clarify a historical point while addressing a perceived misunderstanding.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but the sarcastic tone could be perceived as dismissive.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but the sarcasm could be seen as disrespectful. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement attempts to promote understanding by providing historical context, but the tone may undermine empathy and compassion.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in dialogue by correcting a perceived error, but the sarcastic tone could be seen as a personal attack rather than constructive criticism. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.